REPS PDP CAUCUS ACCUSES GBAJABIAMILA OF COVERING CORRUPTION

People Democratic Party Caucus in the House of Representatives has accused Speaker of the House, Rt Hon Femi Gbajabiamila of covering up in the ongoing investigative hearing of the Niger Delta Development Commission.

The Caucus wants leadership of the House to submit the House to the investigation to be conducted by a panel that should be constituted by President Mohammodu Buhari for proper and independent investigation.

This was contained in a letter sent to the speaker of the House and signed by the leader of the PDP Caucus in the House, Hon O. K. Chinda.

According to the letter, “Considering the allegations against some members of the National Assembly and the need to not only be fair and unbiased but to be seen and believed to be so, we are of the view that the honourable thing open to you in the circumstance is to invite the President, Muhammadu Buhari, to set up a Special Investigative Panel, composed of Justices of the higher bench, to investigate the NDDC and its activities, including the emergency contracts and the roles of members of the National Assembly so named by the Minister”.

“In the alternative, a Judicial Panel of Inquiry be set up to investigate the issues and members of the House of Representatives must submit themselves to such panels. Of course, a precedent was set in the Eight Assembly when your good self, as Majority Leader of the House of Representatives, willingly submitted to be investigated by the Police, following allegations raised by the former Chairman of the Appropriation Committee against the Leadership of the House of Representatives”.

“On this issue, it is our considered opinion that the House Ethics Committee is limited to assert its powers because the issues involved are criminal in nature and your leadership needs to assure Nigerians that members of the House of Representatives are above board and speak for Nigerians”, the Caucus insist.

The caucus stated, We are burdened to write this open letter of appeal to you to take urgent steps to address the eroding credibility of the House of Representatives. Of course, as one of the longest serving Legislators, you are aware that the House of Representatives has faced several challenges since 1999; chief among them is getting the public to repose confidence in the House of Representatives and believe in the integrity of its members and leadership.

We note that accusations by Heads of Agencies and Departments against the legislature are neither new nor strange; they are often tactics deployed by the executive arm to divert attention from the subjects of investigations, as it is often the case.

The situation was not helped by the fact that following the theatrical slump of the Managing Director of NDDC at the hearing, an act believed by many Nigerians to be contrived, you excused him from further questioning by the Committee, saying that the House Committee would rely on his depositions. Your explanations some days after, not withstanding, this action is still being viewed by Nigerians albeit it wrongly, as an attempt to cover up the issue.

All these issues require further investigation because accused persons cannot investigate themselves. As a senior lawyer, you understand the maxim “Nemo judex in causua sua”. Can a Committee of the House in the circumstance truly turn out reports that the public can take seriously and believe in? You have, by this action, opened the room for the public to continue to disbelieve the House of Representatives.

However, events following the accusations have created a serious cause for concern and we are worried that after the Minister responded to your 48-hour ultimatum, you only read part and not the entire content of his letter to the House.

The version of the letter published in the social Media was much longer; and it specifically mentioned names including some members of the National Assembly.

The Caucus insisted that the letter does not exonerate all the members of the House of Representatives as we were told. In fact, it directly mentioned some members in different conflicting and problematic situations with the NDDC.

The Caucus wondered why the speaker had to read some portions and decided to skip other areas where some names were mentioned.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

scroll to top